Torontomatic


Taking Puppy Linux for a Walk
October 6, 2007, 3:46 pm
Filed under: Technology | Tags: , , , , , ,

Booting Linux from a external drive with the applications and settings of your choice has never been easier after this week’s release of Puppy Linux 3.0. Like Damn Small Linux, Puppy is small enough to fit on a USB thumb drive, and like Knoppix , you can boot it from a live CD.

read more | digg story



XO laptop, is amazing, a total kid magnet! Laptop With a Mission Widens Its Audience
October 4, 2007, 3:46 pm
Filed under: Technology | Tags: , , , ,

In November, you’ll be able to buy a new laptop that’s spillproof, rainproof, dustproof and drop-proof. It’s fanless, it’s silent and it weighs 3.2 pounds. One battery charge will power six hours of heavy activity, or 24 hours of reading. The laptop has a built-in video camera, microphone, memory-card slot, graphics tablet, game-pad controllers and a screen that rotates into a tablet configuration.

Enlarge This Image

A laptop for third-world children has a camera, communications ability and a high-resolution screen. Buy two: keep one and the other goes to a child overseas.

And this laptop will cost $200.

The computer, if you hadn’t already guessed, is the fabled “$100 laptop” that’s been igniting hype and controversy for three years. It’s an effort by One Laptop Per Child (laptop.org) to develop a very low-cost, high-potential, extremely rugged computer for the two billion educationally underserved children in poor countries.

The concept: if a machine is designed smartly enough, without the bloat of standard laptops, and sold in large enough quantities, the price can be brought way, way down. Maybe not down to $100, as O.L.P.C. originally hoped, but low enough for developing countries to afford millions of them — one per child.

The laptop is now called the XO, because if you turn the logo 90 degrees, it looks like a child.

O.L.P.C. slightly turned its strategy when it decided to offer the machine for sale to the public in the industrialized world — for a period of two weeks, in November. The program is called “Give 1, Get 1,” and it works like this. You pay $400 (www.xogiving.org). One XO laptop (and a tax deduction) comes to you by Christmas, and a second is sent to a student in a poor country.

The group does worry that people might compare the XO with $1,000 Windows or Mac laptops. They might blog about their disappointment, thereby imperiling O.L.P.C.’s continuing talks with third world governments.

It’s easy to see how that might happen. There’s no CD/DVD drive at all, no hard drive and only a 7.5-inch screen. The Linux operating system doesn’t run Microsoft Office, Photoshop or any other standard Mac or Windows programs. The membrane-sealed, spillproof keyboard is too small for touch-typing by an adult.

And then there’s the look of this thing. It’s made of shiny green and white plastic, like a Fisher-Price toy, complete with a handle. With its two earlike antennas raised, it could be Shrek’s little robot friend.

And sure enough, the bloggers and the ignorant have already begun to spit on the XO laptop. “Dude, for $400, I can buy a real Windows laptop,” they say.

Clearly, the XO’s mission has sailed over these people’s heads like a 747.

The truth is, the XO laptop, now in final testing, is absolutely amazing, and in my limited tests, a total kid magnet. Both the hardware and the software exhibit breakthrough after breakthrough — some of them not available on any other laptop, for $400 or $4,000.

In the places where the XO will be used, power is often scarce. So the laptop uses a new battery chemistry, called lithium ferro-phosphate. It runs at one-tenth the temperature of a standard laptop battery, costs $10 to replace, and is good for 2,000 charges — versus 500 on a regular laptop battery.

The laptop consumes an average of 2 watts, compared with 60 or more on a typical business laptop. That’s one reason it gets such great battery life. A small yo-yo-like pull-cord charger is available (one minute of pulling provides 10 minutes of power); so is a $12 solar panel that, although only one foot square, provides enough power to recharge or power the machine.

Speaking of bright sunshine: the XO’s color screen is bright and, at 200 dots an inch, razor sharp (1,200 by 900 pixels). But it has a secret identity: in bright sun, you can turn off the backlight altogether. The resulting display, black on light gray, is so clear and readable, it’s almost like paper. Then, of course, the battery lasts even longer.

The XO offers both regular wireless Internet connections and something called mesh networking, which means that all the laptops see each other, instantly, without any setup — even when there’s no Internet connection.

With one press of a button, you see a map. Individual XO logos — color-coded to differentiate them — represent other laptops in the area; you connect with one click. (You never double-click in the XO’s visual, super-simple operating system. You either point with the mouse or click once.)

This feature has some astonishing utility. If only one laptop has an Internet connection, for example, the others can get online, too, thanks to the mesh network. And when O.L.P.C. releases software upgrades, one laptop can broadcast them to other nearby laptops.

Power users will snort at the specs of this machine. It has only one gigabyte of storage — all flash memory — with 20 percent of that occupied by the XO’s system software. And the processor is feeble by conventional standards. Starting up takes two minutes, and switching between programs is poky.

read more | digg story



Ubuntu beta, now with flash and flashiness
October 1, 2007, 12:23 am
Filed under: Technology | Tags: , , , ,

Ubuntu is finally following leading Linux versions from Red Hat and Novell that include snazzy 3D graphics in the user interface. Specifically, the version 7.10 “Gutsy Gibbon” uses Compiz Fusion, software that uses OpenGL graphics technology to make windows transparent, map desktops to the faces of a cube, let windows wobble as if made of JELLO.

Various 3D effects can be downloaded and plugged in. Some folks find this eye candy to be a CPU-sucking annoyance, but Mac OS X and Windows Vista have it, and a lot of enthusiasts find it an engaging domain.

read more | digg story



How much is Microsoft’s patent protection worth?
September 30, 2007, 12:20 pm
Filed under: Transit | Tags: , , ,

Novell has been selling this protection hard to its Suse prospects (“Linux is scary because Microsoft might sue. But we have a deal with Microsoft…”). Extortion? Sure. But for some it seems that integrity has a price. For those who can’t be bought, just how much protection are you missing?

read more | digg story



The Chronicles of Technology – The Apple, the Window and the Penguin
September 22, 2007, 5:54 am
Filed under: Technology | Tags: , , , , , , ,

At the moment, for those unwilling to take the Linux or OS X plunge, XP seems to be the only option for many. I myself have started to consider other Operating Systems, using a few different Linux distros, since most of my work is done on the web now. However with many of the different industries I deal with (medical, financial, and others), at present, they do not want Vista. Many cannot quantify getting Vista, with all of the issues occurring in hardware and software compatibility at the moment? Also, many do not want to spends a lot of money ($$$) purchasing new equipment, just for Vista. On the other hand, Windows XP, over time, has become a dependable and generally (*cough*) stable Operating System, since the installment of Service Pack 2 (SP2). Eventually, with more drivers and fixes, Vista will become more stable. However, I think Microsoft is playing a bit of ‘Russian Roulette” and they may want to start hammering away at new areas of revenue. Dell, HP, Acer, Lenovo and others have to sell hardware to survive. Their primary objective may have been to improve the state of security, however only time will tell if Vista becomes the XP of the future or the ‘Millennium Edition’ of the past. Vista is starting to get the ME2 label that people and businesses are avoiding, for now. So Microsoft, if you are listening, you have a lot of PR work to do. Otherwise, get Windows Seven, Microsoft Linux or whoever you are going to buy-out next rolling soon!

By: Torontomatic



My Linux verdict for 2007, Ubuntu is still the best – so far!
September 19, 2007, 3:06 am
Filed under: Technology | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Despite my recent nightmare with Ubuntu (ho hum…), it’s still the best distro available for Linux. In fact that nightmare happened with ALL of the distros I attempted to install, except Slackware based distributions. I am not sure why, but there were some compatibility issues with the hardware on my new PC. It was only a replacement for another and I really did not spend a lot on it, since I was looking for basic Internet access (should have made sure that cheap motherboard was compatible). Generally I never have problems installing Linux. I personally have been using Linux for over 10 years now, of and on. I have not totally removed Microsoft from my existence, but it is coming soon, since most of my work is done on the web now. None, so far, has been as good as Ubuntu. It is not perfect, however overall I still give it a passing grade. I’ve used numerous other distributions of Linux, all with different feelings towards the overall experience. In truth, I fell in love with Ubuntu, Dreamlinux, PCLinuxOS and my favorite little mini-OS Slax. In my opinion, Ubuntu averaged out best for my current situation. I listed my own pros and cons; however this is only from my perspective. I still feel that more work is needed, overall. Linux support is getting better!

Ubuntu

PROS: Overall the best distribution, in a polished and ready to use form. Lots of applications come installed and available for download using a simple and easy to use download/update system. Plug-and-play, for me, worked surprisingly well (almost too good – I kept trying to make it not work). Security updates are easy to install and all of my hardware worked without a hitch.

CONS: Problems with codec support for MP3’s and DVD’s. I am not sure why, yet, but my experience with media was terrible, on the onset. I did try other media players and Amarok was not bad, but in my opinion Rhythmbox was better. Could not get movie DVD’s to play properly at all, however it was not that important to me.

PCLinuxOS

PROS: Overall the experience was almost the same as Ubuntu. It was a polished, out of the box, distribution of Linux. A substantial amount of installed applications and hardware support was pretty good.

CONS: Plug-and-play was almost non existent in my situation. Also, I had issues with video support, not that it did not work. However, I had to tweak the video a bit to get the resolution I wanted, while others worked out of the box. Lastly, I hate the name “PCLinuxOS”. For some reason it irritates me!

NOTE: I will have to follow up with a review of PCLinuxOS 2007; however it did not bode well for me. I could not even get the LiveCD to work, while the older versions worked fine (not sure why).

Dreamlinux

PROS: By far the best looking distribution of Linux, giving you a Mac style and feel. A good set of applications installed, however it was geared towards the media crowd. I never had any problems with ANY type of media (DVD, MP3, CD’s, etc…). Everything worked perfectly. Maybe it’s due to the fact that it is Debian based? But if you are looking to turn an old PC into a media and internet box, definitely try this distro.

CONS: Endless amount of problems with the Synaptic updater, and in most situations it did not work. Installed was an older version of Firefox; however the new distribution probably has since fixed this problem.


Slax

PROS: Quick, fast (once booted) and fits on a USB key. It is also great for technicians, if you need to troubleshoot a badly damaged system. If your system is USB bootable, definitely great for old PCs, turning them into Internet PCs. Also, a good set of applications come installed, with an easy option to download modules (additional applications via .MO files), in a simple manner.

CONS: Hard to install permanently on an old PC.

NOTE: You may want to also consider Puppy Linux or DSL (probably the fastest distro available).

At the end of the day, based on the numbers, Ubuntu has won the hearts and mids of common users. Based on my experience, with some non-Linux users, it is the first Linux distro that I feel comfortable giving to a newbie. However, what the future holds for Ubuntu is unknown. They may want to work more closely with Dell, Acer and others to make sure that the experience with Ubuntu is positive. The future looks bright, as long as the Canonical team continues to release stable desktop distros.

I welcome discussion of any other versions of Linux that you believe should be listed!

By: Torontomatic